In April 2001 MIT seized the high ground in debates about the ownership of
intellectual property associated with the teaching and learning process by
announcing the OpenCourseWare Initiative (OCW). With support from the William
and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the Andrew G. Mellon Foundation, MIT's OCW
initiative makes course materials used in teaching its undergraduate and
graduate subjects available on the Web, free of charge, to any user, anywhere in
the world.
MIT encountered several challenges as it developed its project,
not the least of which was dealing with copyright law. Copyright issues were
addressed by attaching the Digital Commons
license to each item in inventory, providing assurance that users can safely
and legally utilize material they find in the OCW repository. MIT has also
established workflow processes to create online resources and systems to monitor
usage.
Although OCW has revealed the fact that courseware is not as
commercially valuable as previously thought, it has demonstrated that
high-quality material can have a very high social value. It has also
demonstrated the public relations value of an altruistic stance, and most
importantly, created a distribution system for courseware.
Why Should UC
Be Involved with the Open Educational Resource Exchange Movement?
The
efforts of MIT and other institutions that are joining the Open Educational
Resource Exchange (OERE) movement provide some clear examples of the potential
OERE-generated benefits to both UC and its faculty.
Institutional
benefits
1. Provides a visible contribution consistent with the traditional
openness of the University and its commitment to public service.
2. Provides a
public and highly accessible place to store material developed by UC and UC
faculty, material which otherwise is unlikely to be used.
3. Provides the
opportunity to initiate cooperation among UC campuses and faculty
4. Showcases
outstanding courses and faculty
5. Provides students with supplementary
learning materials
6. Increases course quality through its visibility
7.
Allows alumni to retain an academic link to the University
8. Enhances UC's
reputation as an educational leader
9. Provides an archive of material readily
available to teachers and learners
An unexpected but welcome benefit that MIT
has experienced is that the number of "drops and adds" at the beginning of each
term has decreased dramatically -- students can now shop online before the
course begins to see what they are in for, rather than having to attend the
first course meeting.
Benefits to faculty
1. Showcases faculty work
to a very large audience
2. Allows for comments on the work and the opportunity
for updates and improvements based on those comments
3. Provides an academic
legacy (the Digital Commons licenses requires attribution for use)
4. Reduces
preparation time and face-to-face meetings
Faculty at MIT report that through
OCW they have been able to identify cross disciplinary research projects by
searching and reviewing the syllabi of the online material.
In addition, the
OERE movement provides a vehicle for the University to target highly deserving
audiences for its high quality materials. An example is UC Irvine Extension's grant-funded
project to help California K-12 teachers become qualified to teach science
and mathematics.
The OERE movement is but one example of the institutional
impulse to distinguish universities from the commercial interests, including
textbook and journal publishers, who depend on, some would say exploit, the
academic community including students. UC has clearly taken the lead in some of
these new efforts and the OERE movement is another opportunity for UC to
demonstrate its leadership.
Dr. Gary W. Matkin is the Dean of Continuing
Education at University of California, Irvine.